Engineered in Changzhou, Chinacicicai1771@gmail.com · +86 134 0135 8068
Sercan Machinery logoRequest a Quote

ENGINEERED FOR THE PROCESS

Rotary Valve Capacity Calculator and Formula

Estimate rotary feeder capacity in kg/h and t/h, then review the operating factors that change real output.

What this calculation can—and cannot—tell you

The formula converts usable rotor displacement into a theoretical mass flow. It is useful for comparing an initial valve size and speed against a required throughput, provided the loose bulk density and expected pocket filling are realistic.

Four inputs used by the calculator

  • Usable rotor displacement per revolution—not only the nominal inlet size.
  • Rotor speed under the intended operating duty.
  • Estimated pocket filling for the actual material behavior.
  • Representative loose bulk density at the valve inlet.

Engineering checks still required

  • Pressure differential, air leakage and product fallback.
  • Starting torque, drive margin and continuous-duty requirements.
  • Particle damage, abrasion, buildup and rotor-clearance risks.
  • Flange dimensions, available height and maintenance access.

Use the estimate below as a starting point, then confirm the proposed configuration against process data and an approved project drawing.

CAPACITY ESTIMATE

Rotary valve capacity calculator

Enter the usable displacement per revolution, rotor speed, estimated pocket filling and loose bulk density. The result is a theoretical mass flow and should be confirmed with representative material data.

The pre-filled values are an arithmetic example. Replace them with your project data before copying the estimate into an enquiry.

Capacity (kg/h)= displacement (L/rev) × speed (rpm) × 60 × fill efficiency × bulk density (kg/m³) ÷ 1000
Estimated capacity1,463 kg/h1.46 t/hRequest an engineering capacity check

Take this estimate into your enquiry

Copy the calculated inputs and estimate, then paste them into Requirement / notes on the enquiry form. Add your required throughput and real operating conditions; the estimate is not guaranteed performance.

Open the enquiry form

Worked example

For 2.5 L/rev at 20 rpm, 75% filling efficiency and 650 kg/m³ bulk density, the estimate is 1,462.5 kg/h, or about 1.46 t/h.

Why actual capacity changes

  • Cohesive, aerated or poorly flowing powders may not fill each rotor pocket completely.
  • Pressure differential, air leakage and product fallback can reduce effective throughput.
  • Large particles and fragile products may require a lower speed or a different pocket design.
  • Drive sizing must consider torque and starting load, not capacity alone.

SIZE FROM REQUIRED THROUGHPUT

How much rotor displacement is required?

Rearrange the capacity formula to estimate the displacement needed for a stated mass flow:

Required displacement (L/rev)= required capacity (kg/h) × 1000 ÷ [speed (rpm) × 60 × filling fraction × loose bulk density (kg/m³)]

Convert filling efficiency from percent to a fraction: 75% becomes 0.75. Speed, filling fraction and bulk density must all be greater than zero.

Example: a 1,500 kg/h process target

At an assumed 20 rpm, 75% pocket filling and 650 kg/m³ loose bulk density, the arithmetic result is 1500 × 1000 ÷ (20 × 60 × 0.75 × 650) = approximately 2.56 L/rev. These values illustrate the calculation; they are not a recommended operating speed or a guaranteed valve rating.

Check the displacement definition

Ask the supplier for net usable pocket volume per revolution. If a quoted capacity already includes a filling allowance, confirm its assumptions before applying another allowance. Confirm the material behavior, pressure differential and drive requirements with the proposed valve configuration.

Send your target capacity for a sizing review

Include the required kg/h, loose bulk density, material, temperature, pressure conditions and the copied calculation summary.

FROM ESTIMATE TO CONFIGURATION

Choose the product duty after checking capacity

A capacity estimate describes solids flow. The next choice depends on whether the process mainly needs controlled feeding, leakage control across a pressure difference, or both.

Controlled hopper or silo discharge

Review the rotary feeder configuration with your minimum, normal and maximum output. Specify any mass-flow accuracy or weighing requirement separately from the volumetric estimate.

Feeding across a pressure difference

Review the rotary airlock valve configuration with inlet and outlet pressure, temperature and the acceptable leakage requirement. The calculated throughput alone does not establish airlock performance.

Include the copied calculation summary in your enquiry and identify whether the stated displacement is a confirmed supplier value or an assumption requiring review. Use the dimension checklist to confirm that the proposed configuration also fits the installation.

Review the estimate and process duty

APPLICATION NOTES

Engineering considerations for Rotary Valve Capacity Calculation

The main design objective is estimating realistic throughput instead of relying on nominal rotor volume. Confirm rotor displacement, speed, filling efficiency and bulk density before fixing the valve size, rotor and drive arrangement.

Use conservative filling efficiency for cohesive or poorly aerated powders and verify the result against the process target. Sercan reviews these details against capacity, installation interface and maintenance access before issuing a project drawing.

Recommended project checks

View related resources or send operating data for review.

TECHNICAL FAQ

Questions before selection

How is rotary valve capacity calculated?

Multiply usable rotor displacement by revolutions per minute, 60 minutes per hour, filling efficiency and bulk density. Convert litres to cubic metres by dividing by 1000.

Is the calculator result the guaranteed output?

No. It is a theoretical estimate. Material flowability, pressure differential, air leakage, rotor geometry and operating conditions can change actual throughput.

Which bulk density should be used?

Use representative loose bulk density at the valve inlet. Do not substitute particle density, because it can substantially overstate capacity.